Posterous
Jennifer is using Posterous to post everything online. Shouldn't you?
Photo_235_thumb
 

jayjay’s stuff

PhD-related links

Internet in everyday life: 3 approaches

Here, Bakardjieva (2009) distinguishes three main approaches to the study of the Internet in everyday life. Quite straight forward but I liked the simplicity...

ETA: I'm currently working on a research project where the client wants to span all three areas - in a very short period of time - I know my stance sits more in the "critical" framework, but it is interesting trying to reign back those who think studying the Internet should be straight forward and easy because there is an assumed wealth of data at their finger tips. I would like to think that it is a lot harder than that. Thanks to the dazzling effects of data overload and lumps of generalisations based on poor quality information (which is mainly generated by those who want to sum up the world in 3 days!) - we've probably made it a lot more complicated to really see what is going on.

Bakardjieva, M. (2009) The Internet in Everyday Life: Exploring the Tenets and Contributions of Diverse Approaches. In Burnett, R, M. Consalvo and C. Ess (eds) The Handbook of Internet Studies. Wiley-Blackwell (via media/anthropology)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   framework   internet   research  
Posted November 14, 2009
// 0 Comments

Mapping the Conversations

Scolari (2009) tracks the historical path of new media discussions from the "founding fathers" of 1960, through varied degrees of cybercultural studies to the current form of internet studies which exist today ("today" being stemmed from the Web 2.0 discussion etc) Although tipping his hat to the needs of new forms of research within the field, he quite rightly argues that it is all too easy to discuss and speculate about predictions, based on anecdotal experiences. Combined with the surge of journalistic tendencies, mainly focussing on the utopian and dystopian elements of emerging media technologies - the myths of a narrative are exposed. The chat is fashionable and surprisingly comfortable. That'll be because absolutely zero research is required to have an opinion.

Mate, I couldn't have said it better myself.

"Digital media research cannot be limited to the old TMC models. The new forms of collaborative communication are challenging traditional broadcasting systems and theories, so new categories and methodologies are needed...Research into digital communication should not, however, be diluted into a discursive melting pot of conjectures, speculations and utopian/dystopian views which may sound fashionable but are difficult to articulate into a coherent theoretical corpus." (Scolari, 2009: 956)

Scolari, C. A. (2009) Mapping the conversations about new media: the theoretical field of digital communications. New Media and Society, Vol. 11. P943-964)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   critical   framework   internet   research  
Posted November 11, 2009
// 0 Comments

IOC Cease and Desist (via Flickr)

More details:

http://richardgiles.com/2009/10/09/the-olympics-and-creative-commons-photographs/

http://richardgiles.com/2009/10/14/the-olympics-and-creative-commons-photographs-part-2/

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   flickr   ioc   media rights   olympics   research  
Posted November 2, 2009
// 0 Comments

City of bits: space, place, and the infobahn

A couple of things:

After the last post, I was recommended to get this book, City of Bits (1995) (William J Mitchell) by my supervisor- so I have ordered in on Amazon and have began reading a small preview on Google books.

Of the short section I've scanned over, already picking out themes of identity which still haven't really changed in the last 15 years since the book's beginnings.

I've maintained the principle that online interaction is becoming less literal (no need for an obvious avatar, ala Second Life - rather a multitude of interactions on different levels and platforms) - so I like the perspective that identity online is heavily manipulative, and reliant on how you think others see you. Michael Wesch suggested in his presentation about politics of authenticity that online communication is truly the first communication mechanism where we have been forced to look at ourselves in the reflections of others. Using youtube as his main example, Wesch shows clips of his students using Youtube for the first time, coming to terms with talking to a webcam, watching back their videos from the perspective of others and contemplating how others might see and understand them as human beings.

What Mitchell is saying here, however, is that persona is created by other people and can lead to a jarring sensation when you actually decide to meet in "meatspace" - Certainly, when you work with online media, maintaining an online identity is a full time occupation, but the notions of private and public start being more about what you prefer or WANT people to see about you, rather than who you actually are (it is said that if you never lie, you never have to remember anything...).

I don't think that feeling will ever go away, at least with online media in its current guise, but the fact that we have managed to change, or at least add to how we understand ourselves as individuals is fascinating.

Posterous keeps getting cooler - being directly able to lift pages from google books can never be a bad thing. All I need now is to be allowed to use a digital highlighter to complete the paperless transition.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   framework   internet   research  
Posted November 2, 2009
// 0 Comments

There is nothing new here...

I'm currently reading through my notes from my MA degree, editing and
updating them and reviewing quotes to see if it is worth re-reading
particular concepts. I'm increasingly aware of the dates in which a
lot of these books were written, well over 10 years ago now - and yet,
I sit through tweetstream after tweetstream of new media related
events, I can't help feeling that I've heard it all somewhere before.
We are truly inoculated from our past experiences. Stop waffling and
taking half-baked opinions for granted, look at the past, we need a
purpose and we need dedicated evidence. Otherwise we're just wasting
time - it's been said before, with definitely more succinctness and far
better examples.

“Technology catalyses change not only in what we do but in how we
think. It changes people’s awareness of themselves, of one another, of
their relationship with the world.” (Turkle, 1984: 3)

New Media “…enables a system of multiple
producers/distributors/consumers, an entirely new configuration of
communication relations in which the boundaries between those terms
collapse. A second age of mass media is on the horizon.” (Poster,
1995: 3)

“What is new about new media comes from the particular ways in which
they refashion older media and the ways in which older media refashion
themselves to answer the challenges of new media.” (Bolter & Richard,
1999: 15)

Theories associated with the arrival of a post-industrial society:

Daniel Bell and Post-Industrialism
The Coming of Post-Industrial Society (1973)
“...argues that the post-industrial society emerged from changes in
the social sector. He sees the economy and occupational structure as
influential here, but does not see politics or culture as significant
factors in the change.” (Nayar, 2004: 49)

Manuel Castells and the Informational City
“In a series of works on the informational society Castells identifies
an 'informational mode' of development. This is a new
sociotechnological paradigm, with information processing as the main
activity. Information processing influences all the processes of
production, distribution, consumption and management.” (Nayar, 2004:
52)

Jean Baudrillard and Postmodern Simulacra
“Baudrillard's work has been enormously influential in media studies
of the new age, has constantly emphasised the image, the development
of 'virtual' models of reality and the commodity-consumerist culture
of contemporary life.” (Nayar, 2004: 53)

“Baudrillard's central argument is that in the age of perfect
reproduction and endless repetition of images, the distinction between
the real and the illusory, between original and the copy, between
superficiality and depth has broken down. What we now have is a
culture of 'hyperreality'.” (Nayar, 2004: 53)

Arjun Appadurai and Globalised Culture
“Appadurai's work (2000 [1990]) argues that the central problem of
contemporary globalising processes in the 'tension between cultural
homogenization and cultural heterogenization.” (Appadurai, 2000: 94,
in Nayar, 2004: 56)


Bolter, J. and Richard, G (1999) Remediation - Understanding New
Media, Cambridge, MIT Press: MA
Nayar, P. K. (2004) Virtual Worlds: Culture and Politics in the Age of
Cybertechnology Sage: London
Poster, M. (1995) The Second Media Age. Blackwell: Cambridge
Turkle, S. (1984) The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit,
Granada Publishing: London

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   innoculation   internet   new?   research  
Posted October 26, 2009
// 0 Comments